Image Credit: Luke Jerram
H/T to io9
With the swine-flu pandemic ramped up to a national emergency on Friday, it seems a fitting moment to discuss Luke Jerram’s virology art, which includes the stunning depiction of H1N1 above.
Mesmerizingly beautiful and painstakingly researched, Jerram’s sculptures of notoriously deadly microbes also function as wry commentary: they target both the sensationalism of popular medical reportage as well as the claims to objectivity that underlie scientific visualizations.
In an interview with SEED, Jerram acknowledges that his project challenges the opacity of science communication, inviting non-specialists to be more critical of the scientific images they consume. His sculptures comment on scientific objectivity, calling attention to how specialists’ conventions determine the perceived accuracy of an image. By foregrounding the natural transparency of microbes, the glass sculptures underscore the limits of scientific vision. As SEED explains, "Microbes—such as bacteria, protists, and viruses—aren’t the brightly colorful creatures often seen in journals and newspapers. EM images and technical renderings are typically colored by scientists, either to mark processes or simply for aesthetic reasons.” Most viruses are also at the edge of our microscopes’ capabilities of perception, so visualizing them is a balancing act that involves an element of speculation. As Jerram notes, “We’re imposing our culture on scientific data whether we like it or not.”
Image Credit: Luke Jerram
H/T to io9
So, why does one get a sense of frisson, a shudder of illicit pleasure, at viewing these sculptures? What does it mean to grow weak-kneed when confronted with the beautiful form of the smallpox virus, which killed an estimated 500 million human beings in the 20th century? Is there a kind of species betrayal going on when deadly microscopic killers are displayed like rare jewels, as in the almost languorous pose of the bacterium E. coli above? There’s a suggestion here that our depictions of nature are colored (literally, in the case of microbes) by human values and human fears. In response, Jerram’s virology art offers this challenge: is it possible to find beauty in what can kill us?
LabLit has another conversation with Jerram, and you can scope out galleries of his haunting artwork at
SEED and The Guardian.
Comments
Images of the Virus
This post is fascinating! It reminded me of an electronic hypertext/animation
Carrier: Becoming Symborg from the Electronic Literature Collection. Students in my class last semester found this piece particularly alienating, since it invited you to identify with the Hepatitis C virus; entering the site actually requires you to meld with the virus, which is described in sexualized, haunting terms. Like the aesthetic beauty of the H1N1 sculptures, Carrier violates a range of sensibilities about disease and the body. The humanism of the Carrier piece, finally, is held in the patient narratives embedded more deeply in the hypertext. If you explore the site, you find patient voices, accessed through links, who are grappling with diagnosis, helping you understand why we need a less antithetical, more wholistic concept of disease. The author description says, "We are lead through the site by sHe, an intelligent viral agent, who crosses our species boundary, penetrating our cellular core, repositioning viral infection as positive biological merging with the flesh." I find the site strange, but truly progressive.
Luke Jerram's virology sculptures
Thanks so much for showing us this unique and beautiful art. You raise the excellent question: “why does one get a sense of frisson, a shudder of illicit pleasure, at viewing these sculptures? What does it mean to grow weak-kneed when confronted with the beautiful form of the smallpox virus, which killed an estimated 500 million human beings in the 20th century?”
I think the way we see these exquisite sculptures today, as humans become increasingly concerned about the environment, may be different from the way we would have viewed them several years ago. We humans are slowly becoming aware that we are not the raison d’etre of the planet nor the pinnacle of its evolution. These little microbes were here millions of years before us, and they will long outlive us. They’ve survived every planetary catastrophe, dinosaur extinction included. We are a tiny blip in their long, elegant evolutionary history.
Maybe the sculptures’ frisson is partly fear, as horror movies are pleasurable for some people. Virus’s ability to destroy us via disease is only one demonstration of their power over us. The entire planet belongs to the microbes, not to us. That’s scary.
But we can also see this from a more positive perspective. We love stories of the underdogs winning out: David against Goliath, the scrappy Minute Men against the seemingly invincible British army.
Maybe if we ally ourselves with the David-power of “simple” life forms, they will help rescue us from the Goliath of a mess we’ve made of the planet. Fungi have been found growing all over the ruins of Chernobyl, feeding off its radiation http://www.technologyreview.com/blog/duncan/17611/. Researchers in California have discovered that mushrooms will grow on oil spills, transforming pollution into healthy life: http://fungiperfecti.com/mycotech/mycova.html. Microbes flourish in every seemingly hostile environment on earth, including deep underwater in the boiling hot volcanic vents of the mid-oceanic trenches, feeding off what we humans think of as toxic minerals. Nature, “imaginative by necessity, has already solved many of the problems we are grappling with. Animals, plants, and microbes are the consummate engineers. They have found what works, what is appropriate, and most important, what lasts here on Earth.” http://biomimicryinstitute.org/about-us/what-is-biomimicry.html
So I think it’s perfectly appropriate to marvel at Jerram’s sculptures as celebrations of the tremendous, elegant, wonderful power of microbes.
David v. Goliath
Apologies for taking so long to reply to your thoughtful commentary. I especially enjoyed yr David v. Goliath reference. I recently taught Kurt Vonnegut's Galapagos, in which most of humankind is eradicated by a virus that devours female eggs, leaving women infertile; Vonnegut frames this viral triumph in similar terms: "Truth be told, the planet's most victorious organisms have always been microscopic. In all the encounters between Davids and Goliaths, was there ever a time when a Goliath won?"
As for the "David-power" of microbes: here's a TED talk that you might enjoy, which gives insight into the (surprisingly) fascinating nuances of bacterial communication. A student forwarded this link to me back in the spring.
Microbe David-power
My apologies in turn for taking so long responding to your very interesting reply. It's amazing to find in Vonnegut, too, the analogy between microbes and David. And I watched the fascinating TED talk about communication among microbes. Thanks so much for enriching my knowledge in this area.