Reply to comment

Being with Technology

Daniel Everett, detail ofGoals

Noel's post on tweeting with the body reminded me of Daniel Everett's work, which also deals with the intersections of man and machine. His pieces suggest, sometimes playfully, the myriad ways in which interaction with technology shapes selfhood.

a white wall with a banner that reads "self esteem"

a white wall with the words something meaningful

Daniel Everett, two images from Search Queries

All three of the above images suggest the way the Internet in particular affects day-to-day life. While the first image, which invokes the consuming nature of online media, is amusing, the latter two seem somewhat darker.  Their title plays on the frequent overlap of personal/emotional and online searching; if you have or think you might have a personal problem, you check the Internet first. Searching "self esteem" online may yield information that will actually help remedy low self esteem, but it also maintains the aloneness (if not actual loneliness) that can negatively affect happiness levels. I actually searched "something meaningful" and found a lot of self-help information which (depending on the particular advice) can also allow the individual to solve her problem without human contact. The spare, empty room in these words appear emphasizes the absence of others.

man plays old school video game

Daniel Everett, Speed Run

While I think Everett's work gets at the both personal and cultural functions of technology, I wonder what it would be like if it were more immersive. While these images invoke formative experiences with technology, they keep the viewer at a distance; they therefore draw attention to how certain media (photography, for example) work differently than others. How might someone accomplish similar arguments, but within a more interactive space? What work does the recognition of immersion through a more distant viewing experience do?

Reply

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
11 + 1 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.

Your contribution to the blog: Please Read Before Posting

The viz. blog is a forum for exploring the visual through identifying the connections between theory, rhetorical practice, popular culture, and the classroom. Keeping with this mission, comments on the blog should further discussion in the viz. community by extending (or critiquing) existing analysis, adding new analysis, providing interesting and relevant examples, or by making connections between that topic and theory, rhetoric, culture, or pedagogy. Trolling, spam, and any other messages not related to this purpose will be deleted immediately.

Comments by anonymous users will be added to a moderation queue and examined for their relevance before publication. Authenticated users may post comments without moderation, but if those comments do not fit the above description they may be deleted.

Recent comments