Reply to comment

Images of an American Soldier

 

Soldiers waiting to enlist

Image Credit: Craig F. Walker, The Denver Post

H/T: The New York Times

Noel’s comments this past week about the circulation of iconic images of violence and the role of affect in our reception of these images left me wondering about contemporary photojournalism and its treatment of war.  In their text and blog, No Caption Needed, John Louis Lucaites and Robert Hariman have written extensively about the way iconic images, such as the photograph of General Loan executing a suspected member of the Viet Cong, circulate in public culture but what should we make of images that are less well known or that focus on the more mundane aspects of war?

 

Soldiers waiting to be deployed

 

Image Credit: Craig F. Walker, The Denver Post

From July of 2007 through August of 2009 photographer Craig F. Walker and journalists Kevin Simpson, Michael Riley and Bruce Finley documented the life of Ian Fisher as he enlisted in the U.S. Army, went through basic training, and served in Iraq. The series of photographs follow Fisher as he graduates from high school, says good-bye to friends and family, struggles through basic training, and serves on escort missions in Iraq. Quite a few of the photographs, however, show Fisher and other enlisted men waiting around, smoking by the side of the road, or sleeping while they wait to be deployed.  The daily practice of war looks like a lot of standing around.  In fact, the bulk of the action shots document Fisher's time spent in training.  Moreover, the only images that capture and convey any affect focus on the emotional response of Fisher, his friends, and his family as he leaves and returns to the U.S.

This depiction of the waiting around of war seems to play off the more iconic images and cliches that have been burned into our collective memory.  The photo-essay begins by focusing on Fisher's love for his country but later captions tell us of his frustration at having to dig ditches and complaints about having to pick up trash.  Taken as a whole, the essay undermines many of the more traditional narratives of war--we see no transformation from boy into man.  There is little focus on homosocial bonding and friendships forged through fire.  Fisher's love of country slowly devolves into a lament over the tedious tasks of waging a long war.  

Perhaps this portrait is able to emphasize the mundane aspects of war because the photo-journalists spent so much time with Fisher.  Are these photographs simply the byproduct of extended time spent documenting Fisher's service?  Or, maybe we can read this collection of images as anti-iconic.  If we have become inured to the violent or iconic images, perhaps it is time to consider the daily, the dull, and the less-than-decisive-moments of war.

 

Reply

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
1 + 2 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.

Your contribution to the blog: Please Read Before Posting

The viz. blog is a forum for exploring the visual through identifying the connections between theory, rhetorical practice, popular culture, and the classroom. Keeping with this mission, comments on the blog should further discussion in the viz. community by extending (or critiquing) existing analysis, adding new analysis, providing interesting and relevant examples, or by making connections between that topic and theory, rhetoric, culture, or pedagogy. Trolling, spam, and any other messages not related to this purpose will be deleted immediately.

Comments by anonymous users will be added to a moderation queue and examined for their relevance before publication. Authenticated users may post comments without moderation, but if those comments do not fit the above description they may be deleted.

Recent comments