Reply to comment

Visual Search for Wikipedia

The good folks over at Information Aesthetics recently posted a link to Wiki Mind Map. The site provides a mind-map-style outline of topics in Wikipedia.

Screenshot of search for visual rhetoric from Wikimindmap.org

Right now the site appears to be able to search the German, English, Spanish, French, Italian, Catalan, and Indonesian versions of the encyclopedia. It can also search www.self-qs.de, which appears to be some sort of German dictionary (perhaps a German-speaker can help out here).

A few thoughts about this tool jumped out at me immediately: first, it seems like an excellent way for students (and everyone else who uses Wikipedia) to find related topics for a search term. Additionally, it allows visual thinkers to search the Wikipedia knowledge-base without having to read a bunch of annoying text.

However, I'm not sure that the mind map metaphor is the best one for this task. The searches I have done never go beyond the second-level in the hierarchy, making me wonder what purpose the hierarchy serves. Even if the engine was able to add deeper levels of results, I wonder if a simple clustering structure would be better for the presentation. It is unlikely that the deeper levels would be very well ordered, and the clustering method wouldn’t imply the kind of regimented outline that is the basis of the mindmap. If someone could put this same functionality into an interface like Visual Thesaurus and have it search through a couple layers of pages, the tool would be much more handy.

Reply

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
10 + 1 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.

Your contribution to the blog: Please Read Before Posting

The viz. blog is a forum for exploring the visual through identifying the connections between theory, rhetorical practice, popular culture, and the classroom. Keeping with this mission, comments on the blog should further discussion in the viz. community by extending (or critiquing) existing analysis, adding new analysis, providing interesting and relevant examples, or by making connections between that topic and theory, rhetoric, culture, or pedagogy. Trolling, spam, and any other messages not related to this purpose will be deleted immediately.

Comments by anonymous users will be added to a moderation queue and examined for their relevance before publication. Authenticated users may post comments without moderation, but if those comments do not fit the above description they may be deleted.

Recent comments