Reply to comment

Stereographs: site and sight of cultural privilege

keystone stereograph

Image credit: Underwood and Underwood 

Over past week, as I reworked a syllabus for a course on Photography and Literature, I spent some time skimming through the online finding aids and databases that catalog the Harry Ransom Humanities Research Center.  The Stereograph collection at the HRC seems particularly fascinating—it contains over 4,000 images, most of which date to the period between 1870 and 1900.  Introducing students to stereographs can form a jumping off point for considering the intersections of vision, modernity, science and technology, early photography, and tourism.

stereograph

Image credit: Keystone View Company

The majority of the images in the HRC collection were purchased by the Keystone View Company from Underwood and Underwood in 1912.  Part of the fascination of the stereoscope was its ability to create the illusion of depth—viewing two slightly different images set side by side on a card and placed before a stereoscope replicated the perception of depth.  This technology was considered cutting-edge in the last decades of the nineteenth century and is not all that different from techniques used for Viewmasters or even 3-D films. 

underwood stereograph

Image credit: Underwood and Underwood

Many of Keystone stereographs contain extensive captions printed on each card and several participate in a narrative of American imperialism through images of both domestic and foreign spaces.  Circulated among a predominantly middle class audience and displayed in middle class parlors, stereographs offered viewers a culturally-privileged vantage point from which to view the world.  Without ever leaving the sanctity of the domestic space, middle class viewers were able to experience his or her own private mode of mini-imperialism.  Flipping through a pile of stereograph cards, owning and displaying these images of foreign people and places, replicated the broader national project of imperialism.  It might be worth comparing these images to more contemporary ones found in National Geographic or considering them alongside 3-D modern marvels (that raise many of the same questions) such as Avatar. 

Reply

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
4 + 8 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.

Your contribution to the blog: Please Read Before Posting

The viz. blog is a forum for exploring the visual through identifying the connections between theory, rhetorical practice, popular culture, and the classroom. Keeping with this mission, comments on the blog should further discussion in the viz. community by extending (or critiquing) existing analysis, adding new analysis, providing interesting and relevant examples, or by making connections between that topic and theory, rhetoric, culture, or pedagogy. Trolling, spam, and any other messages not related to this purpose will be deleted immediately.

Comments by anonymous users will be added to a moderation queue and examined for their relevance before publication. Authenticated users may post comments without moderation, but if those comments do not fit the above description they may be deleted.

Recent comments