viz.
Visual Rhetoric - Visual Culture - Pedagogy
Site informationRecent Blog Posts
|
Reply to commentReplyYour contribution to the blog: Please Read Before PostingThe viz. blog is a forum for exploring the visual through identifying the connections between theory, rhetorical practice, popular culture, and the classroom. Keeping with this mission, comments on the blog should further discussion in the viz. community by extending (or critiquing) existing analysis, adding new analysis, providing interesting and relevant examples, or by making connections between that topic and theory, rhetoric, culture, or pedagogy. Trolling, spam, and any other messages not related to this purpose will be deleted immediately. Comments by anonymous users will be added to a moderation queue and examined for their relevance before publication. Authenticated users may post comments without moderation, but if those comments do not fit the above description they may be deleted. |
TagsRecent comments
|
Breaking the Union
Coye, this looks like compelling material--I wonder what kinds of issues are raised by food movements borrowing this political/labor connection. Does it mean that food, along with the personal, is always political? And what kinds of politics are being represented here?--I imagine most people would associate things like slow food, etc with an upwardly mobile class position, whereas traditional union movements have often been on behalf of dispossessed individuals. Does that make this a kind of class appropriation?--or is Big Agra always in the bourgeois position?