Reply to comment

Magnum Photos Collection at the Harry Ransom Research Center

Screen Shot of Magnum Photos Archive

Image credit: Screen shot of Magnum Photos Digital Collection

H/T: Katherine Feo and George Royer

On Tuesday, the Harry Ransom Humanities Research Center announced that the Magnum collection of photographs would be catalogued, housed, and made accessible to scholars for research and to the public through exhibitions.  Magnum Photos was founded in 1947 by Robert Capa and Henri Cartier-Bresson and several other photographers as one of the first photographic cooperatives.  While the Magnum website hosts the “living archive” of over 500,000 images in a searchable digital library that is updated daily, the HRC will preserve and make available the nearly 200,000 original press prints including several vintage prints dating back more than 60 years.  In a press release announcing the partnership between the HRC, Magnum Photos, and the new owner of the original press prints, Michael S. Dell’s private investment firm MSD Capital, Dr. Tom Staley—director of the Humanities Research Center noted, "This is a singularly valuable collection in the history of photography [that] brings together some of the finest photojournalists of the profession and spans more than a half century of contributions to the medium.  We are delighted to make these remarkable materials accessible to researchers and students."

Archivists are, of course, both creators and collectors of “value” and this collection is surely a valuable addition to the HRC.  One of Dr. Staley’s collecting maxim’s “Ten percent of an archive represents ninety percent of its value” – indicates the relationship between the portion of an author’s or artist’s papers that seem the most relevant and the rest of the collection that the HRC must take along with that ten percent.  (“Final Destination,” in New Yorker, D.T. Max, June 11 2007).  This quote (and a conference paper written by Katherine Feo) led me to consider the other ninety percent.  Simply put, these valuable collections are massive.  The same New Yorker article referenced above contains several anecdotes about the size of the collections housed at the HRC.  For instance, Norman Mailer’s papers contained 25,000 letters, weighed in at over 20,000 pounds, and was deposited here in Austin via a tractor trailer.

arrival of magnum collection

Arrival of the Magnum Collection

Image Credit: Pete English, www.utexas.edu 

The arrival of the Magnum Photos collection came in two trailer trucks and the journey from New York to Austin set Mark Lubell, Magnum director, to worrying and checking the GPS tracker on the trailers every few minutes (New York Times).  I have to admit, I love the thought of GPS trackers affixed to trailers full of photographs.  Not that I don’t see the value in these images—this collection is one I am anxiously awaiting to explore.  There is, however, something striking in the image of two trailers traveling south on I-81 loaded with one of today’s most significant photographic collections and equipped with a global positioning tracker.  This mental image raised for me a constellation of questions surrounding the physicality of a photograph. Does the sheer size of this two-trailers-large archive lend even more significance to each individual photograph via its association with the collection?   Does the “value” of the collection follow these physical prints to Austin or remain with the members of the cooperative who retain the rights to the images?  In other words, what value do we attach to the physical print as distinct from the image?  How does an archival world that is increasingly digital impact the value of actual press prints?

Reply

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
7 + 2 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.

Your contribution to the blog: Please Read Before Posting

The viz. blog is a forum for exploring the visual through identifying the connections between theory, rhetorical practice, popular culture, and the classroom. Keeping with this mission, comments on the blog should further discussion in the viz. community by extending (or critiquing) existing analysis, adding new analysis, providing interesting and relevant examples, or by making connections between that topic and theory, rhetoric, culture, or pedagogy. Trolling, spam, and any other messages not related to this purpose will be deleted immediately.

Comments by anonymous users will be added to a moderation queue and examined for their relevance before publication. Authenticated users may post comments without moderation, but if those comments do not fit the above description they may be deleted.

Recent comments