Submitted by Matthew Reilly on Tue, 2011-11-29 15:15
Video Credit: Youtube.com
John Lloyd, producer of Spitting Image (1984–1996), tells a story of how he was asked to validate the "humor" of the title ('If the unemployed are hungry, why don't they eat themselves') to television executives who missed his allusion to Jonathan Swift’s Modest Proposal (8:08 min). He had given these lines to the puppet of conservative MP Norman Tebbit (with bat above). Lloyd’s story gestures to two limitations to satire on the boob tube:
1. The public's general lack of familiarity with the satirical tradition
2. A pervasive demand for our ‘satirists’ to operate as ‘comedians’
A brief explanation through the lens of satires during Jonathan Swift's era (17th–18th c.) might clearly show that the english language/english-speaking population once possessed:
1. a refined and self-conscious conception of satire
2. a definite distinction between comedy and satire
To begin, if we consider Samuel Johnson’s Dictionary—published in the golden age of British satire—we find a striking differentiation between:
Comedy: [comedia, Lat.] A dramatick representation of the lighter faults of mankind
Recent comments
2 years 29 weeks ago
2 years 44 weeks ago
2 years 44 weeks ago
2 years 50 weeks ago
3 years 4 weeks ago
3 years 4 weeks ago
3 years 4 weeks ago
3 years 6 weeks ago
3 years 6 weeks ago
3 years 6 weeks ago