<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://viz.dwrl.utexas.edu/old"  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>viz. - Cuban Missile Crisis</title>
 <link>http://viz.dwrl.utexas.edu/old/taxonomy/term/42/0</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Remote Sensing, Logos Images and the Irony of Evidence</title>
 <link>http://viz.dwrl.utexas.edu/old/content/remote-sensing-logos-images-and-irony-evidence</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;My take on visual rhetoric is largely informed by my prior career with the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nga.mil/portal/site/nga01/index.jsp?front_door=true&quot;&gt;National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency&lt;/a&gt;.  In the &lt;a href=&quot;http://workgroups.dwrl.utexas.edu/visual/?q=node/90&quot;&gt;UT Visual Rhetoric Presentation&lt;/a&gt; I have a slide that depicts a photo from the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/nsa/cuba_mis_cri/index.htm&quot;&gt;Cuban Missile Crisis&lt;/a&gt; alongside a picture from Colin Powell&#039;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2003/02/20030205-1.html#13&quot;&gt;Presentation to the UN&lt;/a&gt;. The pictures are embedded below.  I like to make the point that even though these two photos are remotely sensed, captured by a U2 spy plane and a satellite, respectively, and show raw data, presumably objective data, the pictures are hardly objective.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;center&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://workgroups.dwrl.utexas.edu/visual/files/cuban-missiles.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;cuban missiles&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;center&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://workgroups.dwrl.utexas.edu/visual/files/iraq.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;iraq missiles&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Because so few of us are trained military imagery analysts there is a real irony in presenting such photos to the public as evidence, for none of us can verify the contents independently.  Who among us has ever seen a &quot;Sanitized Chemical Munitions Bunker&quot; or a &quot;Missile-Ready Tent&quot;? Our readings of these logos-driven, data-intensive images is entirely dependent on the government&#039;s readings of the images.  They got it right in the Cuban case forty years ago, and wrong in the Iraq case four years ago.   &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Two very cool sites on remote sensing are hosted by the two largest US remote sensing companies, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.geoeye.com/&quot;&gt;GeoEye&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.digitalglobe.com/&quot;&gt;DigitalGlobe&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://viz.dwrl.utexas.edu/old/content/remote-sensing-logos-images-and-irony-evidence#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://viz.dwrl.utexas.edu/old/taxonomy/term/42">Cuban Missile Crisis</category>
 <category domain="http://viz.dwrl.utexas.edu/old/taxonomy/term/11">Iraq</category>
 <category domain="http://viz.dwrl.utexas.edu/old/taxonomy/term/41">Irony</category>
 <category domain="http://viz.dwrl.utexas.edu/old/taxonomy/term/40">Remote Sensing</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 14:21:53 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Nate Kreuter</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">103 at http://viz.dwrl.utexas.edu/old</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
