<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://viz.dwrl.utexas.edu/old"  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>viz. - Jack Nicholson</title>
 <link>http://viz.dwrl.utexas.edu/old/taxonomy/term/305/0</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>I&#039;m Jack Nicholson and I approve this message</title>
 <link>http://viz.dwrl.utexas.edu/old/content/im-jack-nicholson-and-i-approve-message</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Today I was introduced to Jack Nicholson&#039;s video endorsement of Clinton.  It is currently making the rounds on YouTube: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;center&quot;&gt;&lt;iframe width=&quot;420&quot; height=&quot;315&quot; src=&quot;https://www.youtube.com/embed/Sp3Pfwrwh48&quot; frameborder=&quot;0&quot; allowfullscreen&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Here&#039;s the problem I see with his montage-style endorsement: Nicholson lets his fictional characters do the talking and the most obvious problem here is that Nicholson rarely plays sympathetic characters.  When the Joker asks me &quot;Who do you trust?&quot; and Col. Jessop from &lt;em&gt;A Few Good Men&lt;/em&gt; tells me how military leadership should work, I don&#039;t feel benevolent towards their recommendation.  Then there&#039;s the appalling moment when we return to Jessop to hear him talk about the &lt;em&gt;sexiness&lt;/em&gt; of a woman in power.  Is speaking through the mouths of liars, murderers, and psychopaths the best strategy to forward an endorsement?  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;center&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://viz.dwrl.utexas.edu/old/sites/default/files/The-Shining-008.jpg&quot; height=&quot;130&quot; alt=&quot;Jack Nicholson in The Shining&quot; /&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://viz.dwrl.utexas.edu/old/sites/default/files/jack-nicholson-chinatown.jpg&quot; height=&quot;130&quot;  alt=&quot;Jack Nicholson being roughed up in Chinatown&quot; /&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://viz.dwrl.utexas.edu/old/sites/default/files/Ferguson-Truth.jpg&quot; height=&quot;130&quot;  alt=&quot;Nicholson screaming you can&#039;t handle the truth in a few good men&quot; /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Are these the cultural icons one wants associated with one&#039;s campaign? &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; At least, to follow up on Tim&#039;s post about the Devil and Hillary Clinton, we have no &lt;em&gt;Witches of Eastwick&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://viz.dwrl.utexas.edu/old/content/im-jack-nicholson-and-i-approve-message#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://viz.dwrl.utexas.edu/old/taxonomy/term/324">celebrity</category>
 <category domain="http://viz.dwrl.utexas.edu/old/taxonomy/term/178">film</category>
 <category domain="http://viz.dwrl.utexas.edu/old/taxonomy/term/9">Hillary Clinton</category>
 <category domain="http://viz.dwrl.utexas.edu/old/taxonomy/term/305">Jack Nicholson</category>
 <category domain="http://viz.dwrl.utexas.edu/old/taxonomy/term/258">Political Ads</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 20:27:50 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Jillian Sayre</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">246 at http://viz.dwrl.utexas.edu/old</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
