Reply to comment

Form, Function, and Fonts: Eric Gill’s Branding Type

Picture of Eric Gill's Four Gospels; the book is opened to Luke 2; the letters are illustrated with three shepherds coming to pay tribute to the baby Jesus

Image Credit: The Library of Congress

Eric Gill’s illustrated 1931 The Four Gospels of the Lord Jesus Christ According to the Authorized Version of King James I may be the most beautiful text in the Harry Ransom Center’s King James Bible exhibition.  Gill, who was a graphic designer, a sculptor, and a firm Catholic, melded his minimalist design aesthetics with Catholic art’s gilded tradition to make what the Library of Congress calls “a modern homage to the tradition of illuminated text.”  Gill’s black and white figures, however, dance around the elegant typeface to create a Catholicism aesthetically rebranded for the twentieth century: sparse but still striking.

(Slightly NSFW after the break.)

This image shows Matthew 25-26; the capital A of "And it came to pass" has Jesus having his feet washed by Mary Magdalen set behind it

Image Credit: Wandering the Dream Space

The rationale for Gill’s design choices can perhaps be understood in his Essay on Typography, which was first published the same year as the Four Gospels:

It is now clearly understood that modern building must not rely upon ornament, it must rely simply upon grandeur, that is integrity and size.  There are things which can be measured; with these alone can the modern architect, employing the modern workman, concern himself.  Of beauty there need be no lack, for the beautiful is that which pleases being seen, and those things are pleasing when seen which are as nearly perfect as may be in their adaptation to function.  Such is the beauty of bones, of beetles, of well-built railway arches, of factory chimneys (when they have the sense to leave out the ornamental frills at the top), of the new concrete bridge across the Rhine at Cologne, of plain brick walls. (8-9)

Reading this against the Gospels, what strikes me is Gill’s interest in form and function.  He writes here that beauty comes not from ornament but from forms adapted best to function—thus, why “plain brick walls” may be beautiful, but perhaps not jewel-encrusted objet d’art.  Typography, however, has different functions than a chimney.  As Christopher Micklethwait has previously discussed on viz, graphic design concerns itself with typography, layout, and chromatics.  The New Typography, represented by Jan Tschichold as well as Eric Gill, concerned itself with clarity instead of beauty.  If text’s designed function is clarity and legibility, Gill’s designs do not get in the way of reading—in fact, they enhance and draw attention to text as his characters sometimes seem to perch over the letters.  The iconographic figures resonate with a medieval religious tradition, but the design avoids being overly florid.

This image shows the opening to John 1 in Gill's Four Gospels; the "In" that heads the page has Adam and Even standing naked in Eden as the Virgin Mary leaps over the N

Image Credit: The Harry Ransom Center

This illustration is particularly interesting as the major figure’s alignment with the downstroke of the N draws our attention to the word—both the one on the page and The Word of the Gospels.  Also running parallel is the squiggly line of the snake, climbing towards the innocent Adam and Eve, who almost seem to greet the fall awaiting them.  In this way, Gill’s design highlights the function of the text: to bring the reader to a greater appreciation of Christianity.

This is an image of the word "and" from Gill's Four Gospels; however, the slant of the A is a ladder a figure walks up to take Jesus down from the cross

Image Credit: Wandering the Dream Space

However, Gill’s designs are not without art.  As a Catholic in the mode of Hilaire Belloc, Gill’s designs also provide an interpretive gloss.  The starkness of Jesus being taken from the cross invokes not the Second Vatican Council but a much more medieval tradition.  It also doesn’t seem coincidental that Gill’s famous Gill Sans typeface has effectively served to brand other organizations, like Penguin Books’ famous paperback designs.

Image of Penguin paperbacks on a grid of five by three; included texts are Capote's Breakfast at Tiffany's and Burgress' A Clockwork Orange, among others.  All of the paperbackss are orange with a white band in the middle of the title, with the classic Penguin logo at the bottom of the book

Image Credit: William Wu Books

Gill Sans also has power as a nationalistic British brand, as the BBC has used Gill Sans in its logo since 1997.

This image is the logo for the British Broadcasting Service; it is the letters B B C in white, set in black squares

Image Credit: The BBC

Martin Lambie-Nairn, the designer responsible for the new logo, redesigned the BBC logo not only because the slanted letters used previously did not transfer well to pixels, but because “by choosing a typeface that has stood the test of time, we avoid the trap of going down a modish route that might look outdated in several years’ time.”  As a brand that attempts to be associated with solidity and seeks the trust of its viewers, it seems a good choice on the BBC’s part.  However, it leaves me to wonder how the University of Texas at Austin's and the Harry Ransom Center’s type brands them.

Harry Ransom Center logo

Image Credit: The Harry Ransom Center

The Harry Ransom Center’s classic logo not only conveys a certain stylish solidity but also includes its windows and its materials as a design element alongside the font.  By putting Gill’s lettering not only in its exhibitions but also on their windows, the Harry Ransom Center nods to Gill’s design legacy and its value for research institutions today.

The opinions expressed herein are solely those of viz. blog, and are not the product of the Harry Ransom Center.

Reply

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
1 + 5 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.

Your contribution to the blog: Please Read Before Posting

The viz. blog is a forum for exploring the visual through identifying the connections between theory, rhetorical practice, popular culture, and the classroom. Keeping with this mission, comments on the blog should further discussion in the viz. community by extending (or critiquing) existing analysis, adding new analysis, providing interesting and relevant examples, or by making connections between that topic and theory, rhetoric, culture, or pedagogy. Trolling, spam, and any other messages not related to this purpose will be deleted immediately.

Comments by anonymous users will be added to a moderation queue and examined for their relevance before publication. Authenticated users may post comments without moderation, but if those comments do not fit the above description they may be deleted.

Recent comments